Uncategorized

How to Measure Culture Change: The Metrics That Actually Matter

By Chris Cancialosi
Published at In Category Uncategorized

Here’s a question I get all the time from leaders who’ve invested real money and energy into culture work: “How do we know if it’s working?”

It’s a fair question. And the honest answer is: most organizations are measuring the wrong things.

They run an annual engagement survey, see a few points of improvement, and declare victory. Meanwhile, nothing in the day-to-day experience of working there has actually changed. The surveys went up. The culture didn’t.

Measuring culture change is genuinely hard. Not because the tools don’t exist, but because culture itself is a lagging indicator. What you’re actually measuring is behavior — and behavior is downstream of beliefs, norms, and systems that take time to shift.

So let’s talk about what actually works.

Start With Behavioral Indicators, Not Survey Scores

Culture lives in behavior. What do people actually do when no one’s watching? How do they treat each other in difficult meetings? Do they speak up when something’s wrong, or do they go quiet?

Survey scores can tell you how people feel. They can’t tell you how people behave. And behavior is what moves business results.

Some behavioral indicators worth tracking:

  • Decision-making patterns — Are decisions getting pushed down to the right levels, or is everything still escalating to the top?
  • Meeting behavior — Who speaks? Who doesn’t? Is dissent welcomed or quietly discouraged?
  • Accountability actions — When something goes wrong, do people own it or deflect?
  • Cross-functional collaboration — Are teams actually helping each other, or just protecting their turf?

None of these show up neatly in a dashboard. But they’re what actually tells you whether the culture is shifting.

Use Multiple Data Sources

No single metric captures culture. Here’s how I think about the measurement mix:

Quantitative signals — Engagement scores, retention data, internal mobility rates, eNPS, absenteeism. These are useful context but can be misleading in isolation. A team can have high engagement scores and still have a toxic leader creating real damage two layers down.

Qualitative signals — What are people actually saying in skip-levels, town halls, and exit interviews? What stories are circulating? Stories are a culture diagnostic tool that most leaders underuse.

Observational data — This is the most underrated one. Walk the floors. Sit in meetings you weren’t invited to. Pay attention to what’s talked about at lunch. You’ll learn more in an afternoon than from a month of survey analysis.

Customer and partner feedback — Culture shows up externally. If your culture is shifting in a meaningful way, it eventually shows up in how customers experience working with you.

Set a Baseline Before You Start

One of the most common mistakes I see: organizations launch a culture initiative and then, a year later, try to figure out if anything changed. With no baseline.

You cannot measure change from an unknown starting point. Before you do anything — before the workshops, the new values statements, the leadership development programs — document where you are now.

What are the dominant behaviors? What are the unspoken rules? What stories do people tell about what it’s really like to work here? That’s your baseline. Everything else gets measured against it.

Measure at Multiple Levels

Culture isn’t uniform across an organization. The culture on the fifth floor can be radically different from the culture in the call center. And measuring only at the enterprise level will mask what’s actually happening.

Drill down. Look at team-level data. Watch for pockets of the culture you’re trying to build — and pockets of persistent resistance. Both are telling you something.

Be Honest About the Timeline

Culture change doesn’t happen in a quarter. Most meaningful culture shifts take two to five years of sustained effort. If you’re evaluating your program at the six-month mark and declaring it a failure because the numbers haven’t moved, you’re setting yourself up to keep starting over.

What you should see early on: leading indicators. Leadership behavior changes. A few more people speaking up in meetings. Stories starting to shift. These aren’t results yet — they’re signals that the work is real.

The lag between behavior change and culture change is real. Stick with it long enough to actually see it.

The Question to Ask Yourself

Here’s a simple gut-check I use with clients: If you pulled 10 random employees into a room and asked them to describe the culture without coaching, would you like what you heard?

Not the culture you’re aspiring to. The culture as it actually is, today, in how people work and treat each other and make decisions.

If the answer makes you uncomfortable, that discomfort is data. Use it.

Measuring culture change isn’t about finding numbers that make leadership feel good. It’s about developing the organizational self-awareness to know whether the work you’re doing is actually landing — and the discipline to keep going when it isn’t yet.

Related: Organizational Culture Change: A Practical Guide

How Leaders Shape Organizational Culture (Whether They Mean To or Not)

By
Published at In Category Uncategorized

Here’s something most leaders don’t fully reckon with: you are always shaping your organization’s culture. Not just when you roll out a values initiative or kick off an all-hands meeting. Every day, through the decisions you make, the behaviors you model, and the things you let slide, you’re sending signals about what actually matters here. The question isn’t whether you’re influencing culture. It’s whether you’re doing it on purpose.

The relationship between leadership and organizational culture is inseparable. Culture doesn’t emerge from a deck of values posted in the break room. It emerges from the lived experience of working in your organization — and leaders are the single biggest driver of that experience.

Culture Is a Reflection of Leadership Behavior

Employees are extraordinarily good at reading between the lines. They watch what leaders do far more closely than they listen to what leaders say. When a senior leader preaches psychological safety but shuts down dissent in meetings, the team learns the real rule fast. When a manager talks about work-life balance and then sends Slack messages at 10 PM, the culture that sticks is the one that says availability equals commitment.

This isn’t a cynical observation — it’s just how organizations work. People look upward to understand what’s expected and what’s rewarded. Leadership behavior and culture are linked in a continuous feedback loop. The culture reinforces certain behaviors, and those behaviors reinforce the culture. Breaking that loop requires more than good intentions; it requires visible, consistent action.

Unintentional Culture Is Still Culture

Many organizations end up with cultures they didn’t design. A leadership team that’s intensely focused on execution and results — without deliberate attention to how results are achieved — can accidentally build a culture of short-termism, internal competition, or burnout. Nobody decided that was the goal. But the signals stacked up over time, and that’s what the culture became.

This is one of the most common patterns we see in our work: organizations where senior leaders are genuinely surprised by their culture assessment results. They describe a culture they aspire to, and the data describes something quite different. The gap isn’t usually the result of bad values. It’s the result of leadership behaviors that were never examined closely enough.

The Specific Ways Leaders Shape Culture

It helps to get concrete about the mechanisms. Leaders shape culture through:

What they pay attention to and measure. If the only thing that gets talked about in leadership reviews is revenue, that’s a signal. If customer satisfaction, employee wellbeing, or quality show up consistently alongside financial metrics, that’s a different signal.

How they respond to problems and failure. A leader who responds to mistakes with blame creates a culture of fear and concealment. A leader who treats mistakes as learning moments — while still holding people accountable — builds something more resilient.

What they tolerate. The behaviors leaders allow without consequence define the real norms, regardless of the official ones. If high performers are routinely excused for treating people poorly, the message is clear: results trump character.

Who they hire, promote, and let go. Personnel decisions are among the most culturally significant things a leader does. Every promotion is a statement about what the organization values.

Culture Change Has to Start at the Top

Organizations often try to shift culture through programs — training initiatives, employee engagement surveys, culture workshops. These tools have real value, but they don’t work if leadership behavior stays the same. You cannot train frontline employees into a culture that senior leaders haven’t modeled themselves.

Sustainable culture change requires leaders to do the harder work first: understanding the culture they currently have, identifying the gaps between that culture and the one the organization needs, and then visibly, personally committing to behaving differently. That’s not comfortable. It requires real self-awareness and a willingness to examine habits that may have contributed to success in the past.

This is where leadership development services become a genuine business lever — not as a perk or a check-the-box exercise, but as a structured way to close the gap between how leaders are currently operating and how the culture needs them to operate.

What Intentional Cultural Leadership Looks Like

Leaders who shape culture intentionally share a few common practices. They talk explicitly about culture — not in abstract value statements, but in specific terms connected to daily decisions. They solicit honest feedback and actually change behavior based on it. They’re consistent: the way they behave in a high-stakes board meeting and the way they behave in a routine one-on-one aren’t dramatically different. And they hold themselves to the same standards they hold their teams to.

None of this is complicated in theory. In practice, it requires discipline and follow-through over a sustained period of time. Culture doesn’t change in a quarter. But it does change — and the lever is almost always leadership.

The Bottom Line

If your organization has a culture problem, look at leadership first. Not to assign blame, but because that’s where the leverage is. The good news is that because leadership behavior drives culture, changing the culture is within reach for any organization willing to do the honest work of examining how its leaders actually show up — and making a genuine commitment to doing better.

That’s not a soft proposition. It’s a strategic one.

Why Culture Change Programs Fail in Year Two

By
Published at In Category Uncategorized
Strategy Consulting Development - People Strategy Consulting

Why Culture Change Programs Fail in Year Two

by Chris Cancialosi

Year one of a culture change initiative feels like progress. There’s energy. People are talking about the new values. Leaders are saying the right things in town halls. A few early wins are getting recognized. The engagement survey scores are up.

Then year two happens.

The energy dissipates. The language fades back into old habits. The early wins stop getting celebrated because they’re no longer new. Somewhere around month 14 or 18, a senior leader pulls you aside and asks why the culture still feels the same as it did before you started.

I’ve watched this play out at organizations across industries — large and small, civilian and federal, high-performing and struggling. Year two is where most culture change initiatives go to die. Not because the organizations aren’t serious. Not because culture change is impossible. It happens because of three specific, predictable failure modes that most organizations hit the same wall with.

Failure Mode 1: The Initiative Ran. Culture Work Didn’t Start.

There’s a distinction I’ve made with clients for years that doesn’t get said enough: running a culture initiative and doing culture work are not the same thing.

A culture initiative is a program. It has a launch date, a facilitator, deliverables, and an end date. Culture work is ongoing — it’s embedded in how decisions get made, how performance gets managed, how leaders actually behave on a Tuesday afternoon when nobody’s watching.

Most organizations do the initiative. They bring in consultants, run workshops, build new value statements, do the all-hands. Then the initiative ends and everyone goes back to their regular jobs. The mistake isn’t running the initiative — that can be useful. The mistake is treating the initiative as the culture change, rather than as the spark for it.

Culture changes when behavior changes consistently, over time, across levels of the organization. That doesn’t happen because of an initiative. It happens because of sustained attention, reinforcement, and accountability — things that require ongoing leadership commitment, not a one-time event.

Failure Mode 2: Leadership Alignment Quietly Eroded

In year one, leadership alignment is usually strong. Everyone signed off on the strategy. The executive team sat in the kickoff. The CEO sent the all-company email.

By year two, that alignment has often silently dissolved. Not because anyone decided to abandon the effort — it happened through a series of small choices that each seemed reasonable at the time.

The Q3 planning process ran long and the culture review got cut. The new CHRO had a slightly different philosophy and nudged the approach in a different direction. Two of the original culture champions got promoted and their replacements weren’t briefed. The executive team stopped checking in on culture goals because they weren’t tied to quarterly business performance.

This is how alignment erodes. Not with a bang, but with a hundred small deferrals.

When I’m working with a leadership team on organizational culture change, the question I always come back to is: what is the mechanism for sustaining alignment over time? Not the kickoff. Not the retreat. The mechanism for year two, year three, the annual review. If you can’t answer that question specifically, you’re building on a foundation that will crack under normal organizational pressure.

Failure Mode 3: The Measurement System Didn’t Change

Here’s one I see constantly, and it drives me a little crazy: organizations that invest in culture change but don’t touch their performance management systems.

You tell people the organization values collaboration. Then you measure and reward individual contributors who hit their numbers regardless of how they treat people. You say innovation is a core value. Then you promote the people who execute cleanly and protect their budgets.

Employees are not naive. They watch what gets rewarded and what gets penalized. When there’s daylight between the stated culture and the operational reality, they trust the operational reality. Every time.

Real organizational culture change requires that the measurement and reward systems actually reflect the values you’re trying to embed. That means updating what you measure in performance reviews. It means factoring in how people lead, not just what they deliver. It means being willing to have hard conversations when high performers are actively damaging the culture they’re supposed to be building.

That’s hard work. It requires real willingness to change systems that are already working in some ways. Most organizations would rather run another workshop.

What Year-Two Survivors Do Differently

The organizations I’ve seen actually stick the landing on culture change have a few things in common.

They treat culture like a business problem, not a people program. Culture goals are on the same dashboard as revenue goals. They get reviewed with the same frequency. Leaders are accountable for them the same way they’re accountable for financial results.

They measure culture behavior, not just culture attitude. Survey scores are useful — I’m a fan of rigorous measurement — but they’re lagging indicators. The organizations that get this right are tracking behaviors: how leaders act in meetings, whether values show up in decisions, whether the behaviors that define the culture are being modeled and reinforced daily. Our Culture Mosaic Survey is built around exactly this distinction.

They’ve made culture visible in the operational systems. Performance reviews, promotion criteria, onboarding, recognition programs — the culture shows up in how the organization actually functions, not just in the posters on the wall and the all-hands slides.

And they’ve accepted that culture change takes longer than the initiative. Three to five years, not three to five months. The leaders who get this don’t need a year-two motivational push — they’ve built the infrastructure to sustain the work regardless of the energy level in any given quarter.

Where This Leaves You

If you’re in the middle of a culture change initiative and year two is starting to feel like running in sand, I’d ask you one question: Are you doing culture work, or are you still running an initiative?

The difference is whether the change is embedded in how the organization operates, or whether it still depends on a dedicated program and a dedicated budget to survive.

If it’s the latter, you’re not in trouble yet. But you’re in the danger zone. This is the moment to make the transition — from initiative-driven to system-driven. That transition is harder than the launch. It’s also the one that determines whether any of this sticks.

We’ve helped organizations work through exactly this. If you’re hitting the year-two wall and want to talk through what we’ve seen actually work, I’m glad to have that conversation.

Organizational Culture Consulting: What It Is and Why It Works

By
Published at In Category Uncategorized

Most leaders know something is off before they can name it. Turnover is higher than it should be. Strategy rollouts stall. Teams that looked aligned on paper are quietly working at cross-purposes. When those patterns persist despite good intentions and solid leadership, the issue is usually cultural — and that’s where organizational culture consulting comes in.

This post walks through what culture consulting actually involves, what separates effective firms from expensive ones, and how to know if your organization is ready to use it.

What Is Organizational Culture Consulting?

Organizational culture consulting is the practice of helping leaders understand, shape, and align the values, behaviors, and norms that drive how work actually gets done in their organization. Not how it’s supposed to get done — how it actually gets done.

That distinction matters. Every organization has a stated culture and a lived culture. The gap between those two is where most problems live. A good culture consultant helps you see that gap clearly, understand what’s driving it, and build a credible path to close it.

The work typically involves some combination of culture assessment, leadership alignment, change strategy, and sustained reinforcement over time. It’s not a workshop. It’s not a values poster. Done right, it changes how decisions get made, how leaders behave, and how the organization experiences itself from the inside.

Why Organizations Bring in Outside Help

Leaders sometimes resist calling in outside support because it feels like an admission that something is broken. That’s the wrong frame. Organizations bring in culture consulting firms for a lot of reasons — and most of them are proactive, not reactive.

Common triggers include: a merger or acquisition where two cultures need to integrate, a strategy shift that requires new behaviors to succeed, leadership transitions that expose misalignment, or chronic performance gaps that don’t respond to structural fixes. Sometimes the trigger is simpler — a leadership team that wants an honest read on where the culture actually stands before a major push forward.

The value of outside perspective is that it’s outside. Internal HR and OD teams are talented, but they’re also embedded. A skilled external partner can surface dynamics that insiders can see but can’t easily name — and create the kind of psychological safety that honest assessment requires.

What Good Culture Consulting Actually Looks Like

There’s a wide range of quality in this space, and it’s worth knowing what to look for.

Effective culture transformation services start with rigorous diagnosis. Before any recommendations are made, a good consulting partner wants to understand the current state — through surveys, interviews, leadership sessions, and often a structured culture assessment that gives you data rather than just impressions. You can’t design the right intervention if you don’t know what you’re actually working with.

From there, the work moves into alignment. Senior leaders need to agree on where the culture needs to go and — critically — what role they personally play in getting it there. Culture consulting that skips this step tends to produce nice-sounding frameworks that quietly die in implementation.

Execution is where most efforts fall apart. Real culture change requires consistent reinforcement across systems: how you hire, how you promote, how you recognize behavior, how leaders model the values they’re asking others to live. A consulting partner worth working with will stay engaged through that phase, not just hand you a deck and disappear.

How to Build Organizational Culture Intentionally

The phrase “how to build organizational culture” gets searched a lot, and the honest answer is: slowly, deliberately, and with leadership behavior at the center of it.

Culture is not built through communication campaigns. It’s built through repeated experiences — the decisions leaders make when trade-offs are hard, the behaviors that get rewarded or tolerated, the stories people tell about what it’s really like to work there. Consulting helps you design those experiences intentionally rather than leaving them to chance.

That means working on the structural levers that reinforce culture: onboarding, performance management, leadership development, team norms, and how the organization responds when values are tested. It’s concrete, practical work — not philosophical.

What to Look for in a Culture Consulting Firm

Not all culture consulting firms operate the same way. A few things worth evaluating before you engage:

Do they start with assessment or with their answer? Firms that lead with a pre-packaged solution before understanding your organization are selling a product, not solving a problem.

Can they point to sustained outcomes? Ask about engagements where the culture change held 12 to 18 months after the consulting work ended. That’s the real test.

Will they work with your leaders, or around them? Culture work that bypasses senior leadership rarely sticks. The best firms build leadership capability as part of the engagement, not as an afterthought.

Do they measure anything? Culture is hard to quantify, but it’s not impossible. Firms that can’t tell you how they track progress are flying blind — and so will you be.

Is Your Organization Ready?

Readiness matters. Organizations that get the most from culture consulting usually have a few things in place: senior leadership that’s genuinely willing to look at its own role in the current culture, enough organizational stability to support sustained change, and clarity on why culture matters to the business strategy — not just as a people initiative, but as a performance lever.

If those conditions are present, the work tends to move. If they’re not, the first step in consulting is often building that foundation before anything else can happen.

gothamCulture works with leadership teams at mid-size and large organizations who are ready to take culture seriously — as a business issue, not just an HR one. If that sounds like where you are, we’re worth a conversation.